Author: RSS Feed

  • |

    Apple paid 40% of global taxes to Ireland last year

    Tim Cook teases a 'big week ahead' starting Monday

    In a striking illustration of how corporate tax structures and long-running legal battles can reshape national revenues, Apple paid Ireland $17.1 billion in income taxes during its fiscal year ending September 2025. That sum represented roughly 40% of the company’s worldwide total of $43.2 billion in income taxes for the period, according to a company filing detailing country-by-country liabilities.

    The Irish figure was “significantly higher” than the taxes Apple accrued for the year in that jurisdiction. The difference stemmed primarily from the release of escrowed funds tied to a European Union state-aid case: approximately €13 billion (about $15.18 billion at then-prevailing exchange rates) in back taxes that the EU’s top court ordered Apple to pay Ireland in 2024.

    The roots of this payment stretch back nearly a decade. In 2016, then-European Commission competition chief Margrethe Vestager ruled that Ireland had granted Apple illegal tax benefits through selective tax rulings dating to the 1990s and 2000s. These arrangements allegedly allowed the company to achieve effective tax rates far below Ireland’s standard 12.5% corporate rate (sometimes under 1%) on profits booked through Irish subsidiaries, diverting investment and tax base from other EU countries.

    Ireland and Apple fought the decision vigorously for eight years. Ireland’s government defended its low-tax regime as essential to attracting U.S. multinationals and the substantial direct and indirect economic benefits they bring, including jobs, research activity, and ongoing tax receipts. The money was held in escrow while appeals proceeded. In September 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union sided with the Commission, upholding the recovery order and clearing the way for the funds to reach the Irish state.

    Apple has long maintained that it complied fully with Irish law and that the profits in question derived primarily from intellectual property developed in the United States, arguing they should be taxed there rather than in Ireland.

    These details emerged under the EU’s relatively new country-by-country reporting requirements for large multinationals (those with global revenues exceeding €750 million). The filings require public disclosure of revenues, profits, employees, and taxes paid across jurisdictions, offering unprecedented visibility into how companies allocate their tax base.

    Beyond the headline numbers, the disclosures highlight the concentration of Apple’s European activity in Ireland. The company reported roughly $213.5–213.6 billion in revenues assigned to its Irish operations and pre-tax profits of about $34.6 billion there. It employs 5,575 people in Ireland (home to its European headquarters) translating to pre-tax profits on the order of $6 million per employee. By comparison, figures for other markets, such as Germany (around 4,089 employees), show far lower profit-per-employee metrics and much smaller tax payments relative to the overall total.

    Across 22 specified countries (including 18 EU member states plus others such as Norway, Vietnam, Russia, and Turkey), Apple paid about $17.6 billion in taxes. The remaining $25.6 billion went to all other jurisdictions, which include the United States. Apple’s U.S. federal income tax charge for the same period was reported at $11.5 billion. Over the past five years, the company has paid EU member states a cumulative $34 billion in taxes.

    Apple has emphasized that it is consistently one of the world’s largest taxpayers and that these corporate income tax figures focus on where assets and profits are booked, rather than consumption taxes such as VAT that are collected where customers are located.

    Ireland’s 12.5% corporate tax rate has long made it a preferred European base for U.S. technology and pharmaceutical giants. The strategy has delivered outsized results: in 2024, just three companies (widely identified as Apple, Microsoft, and Eli Lilly) accounted for nearly half of Ireland’s total corporate tax receipts, according to analysis by the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council. This concentration brings both bounty and risk; a shift by even one major payer could significantly affect public finances.

    The timing coincides with broader international efforts to curb profit shifting, including the OECD’s Pillar Two global minimum tax of 15%. Ireland has adapted its rules accordingly, and some of Apple’s recent payments already reflect elements of this framework. Yet the Apple case underscores persistent tensions: while the EU has used state-aid rules aggressively to challenge preferential arrangements, low-tax jurisdictions continue to attract investment, and companies continue to structure operations around intellectual property and holding entities.

    For Ireland, the $17.1 billion infusion is a one-time boost rather than a new normal. Stripping out the back taxes leaves a more conventional annual payment closer to the accrued figure of around $4.8 billion (an effective rate near 13.8% on the year’s Irish-booked profits). Still, the episode reinforces the country’s central role in the European operations of major American firms.

    The disclosures also fuel ongoing debates about fairness in the global tax system. Critics of low-tax regimes argue they erode the tax bases of larger economies; defenders point to the real economic activity, employment, and innovation hubs that such policies help create. Apple’s filings make one point unambiguous: when a decade-old legal dispute finally settles, the cash impact can be enormous, and highly concentrated in a single small EU member state.

    As more multinationals release similar country-by-country data under the new EU rules, expect sharper scrutiny of where profits are booked versus where value is created and where workforces are located. For now, Apple’s 2025 numbers stand as a vivid snapshot of the intersection of corporate strategy, national tax policy, and European competition enforcement.

    Apple doesn’t pay taxes, Apple’s customers do.

    Corporations do not pay taxes, we do. For every dollar or tens of dollars taxed and regulated onto companies, whether it be Apple, Coke or Bob’s Deli, we pay those costs. In reality, companies pay zero taxes, as they simply pass those costs down the line to the consumers of their products. Thus, we pay every dime of every regulation and tax bestowed onto corporations, every – single – dime.Mark Reschke, “Taxing Apple Just Taxes You,” T-GAAP, May 24, 2013


    .

    Source link: https://macdailynews.com/2026/08/24/apple-paid-40-of-global-taxes-to-ireland-last-year/

  • Updated-Apple seeds seventh betas of macOS 27, iOS 27, iPadOS 27, watchOS 27, tvOS 27, & more to developers

     

    iOS 27 public beta

    Apple on Monday seeded the seventh developer betas of its upcoming major operating system updates. The releases cover iOS 27, iPadOS 27, macOS 27 (Golden Gate), watchOS 27, tvOS 27, visionOS 27, and related software including HomePod updates.

    These builds arrive one week after the sixth betas and continue Apple’s summer testing cycle ahead of the expected public launches in mid-September, typically timed with the annual iPhone event. At this late stage, the focus is primarily on bug fixes, stability improvements, and polish rather than major new features.

    The seventh developer betas include:

    • iOS 27.0 beta 7 and iPadOS 27.0 beta 7: 24A5424a
    • macOS 27.0 beta 7: 26A5421a
    • tvOS 27.0 beta 7: 24J5358a
    • watchOS 27.0 beta 7: 24R5358a
    • visionOS 27.0 beta 7: 24M5359a
    • HomePod Software 27 beta 7 also shares the tvOS build.

    Registered developers can download the updates over the air via Settings (or System Settings on Mac) > General > Software Update after enrolling in the Apple Developer Program. Public betas are expected to follow shortly for most platforms.

    Announced at WWDC 2026, the version 27 updates refine the Liquid Glass design language, expand Apple Intelligence features (including a much more advanced Siri AI with conversational capabilities, onscreen awareness, and personal context), and deliver performance enhancements such as faster app launches and improved connectivity transitions. macOS 27 Golden Gate brings these refinements to the desktop, with adjustments for readability like transparency controls and more consistent toolbars.

    Compatibility varies by platform. iOS 27 supports the same iPhones as iOS 26 (including older models like the iPhone 11 series and SE 2nd generation in many cases), while iPadOS 27, watchOS 27, and macOS 27 drop support for certain older devices. macOS 27 is limited to Apple silicon Macs.

    Release notes for the betas highlight resolved issues in areas such as AirPlay and other system components, along with ongoing Apple Intelligence enhancements and known issues that developers should test against.

    Apple is also distributing second release candidates for current-generation updates, including macOS Tahoe 26.7 and macOS Sequoia 15.8, which focus on security and final polish.

    With the September public releases approaching, likely shortly after an expected iPhone event around early-to-mid September, further betas (possibly a beta 8) or release candidates could arrive in the coming weeks.

    As always, beta software can include bugs, reduced battery life, and compatibility quirks, so it is best installed only on secondary or test devices.


    .

    Source link: https://macdailynews.com/2026/08/24/apple-seeds-seventh-betas-of-macos-27-ios-27-ipados-27-watchos-27-tvos-27-and-more-to-developers/