Apple Industry News

Non Breaking News

  • |

    Apple paid 40% of global taxes to Ireland last year

    Tim Cook teases a 'big week ahead' starting Monday

    In a striking illustration of how corporate tax structures and long-running legal battles can reshape national revenues, Apple paid Ireland $17.1 billion in income taxes during its fiscal year ending September 2025. That sum represented roughly 40% of the company’s worldwide total of $43.2 billion in income taxes for the period, according to a company filing detailing country-by-country liabilities.

    The Irish figure was “significantly higher” than the taxes Apple accrued for the year in that jurisdiction. The difference stemmed primarily from the release of escrowed funds tied to a European Union state-aid case: approximately €13 billion (about $15.18 billion at then-prevailing exchange rates) in back taxes that the EU’s top court ordered Apple to pay Ireland in 2024.

    The roots of this payment stretch back nearly a decade. In 2016, then-European Commission competition chief Margrethe Vestager ruled that Ireland had granted Apple illegal tax benefits through selective tax rulings dating to the 1990s and 2000s. These arrangements allegedly allowed the company to achieve effective tax rates far below Ireland’s standard 12.5% corporate rate (sometimes under 1%) on profits booked through Irish subsidiaries, diverting investment and tax base from other EU countries.

    Ireland and Apple fought the decision vigorously for eight years. Ireland’s government defended its low-tax regime as essential to attracting U.S. multinationals and the substantial direct and indirect economic benefits they bring, including jobs, research activity, and ongoing tax receipts. The money was held in escrow while appeals proceeded. In September 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union sided with the Commission, upholding the recovery order and clearing the way for the funds to reach the Irish state.

    Apple has long maintained that it complied fully with Irish law and that the profits in question derived primarily from intellectual property developed in the United States, arguing they should be taxed there rather than in Ireland.

    These details emerged under the EU’s relatively new country-by-country reporting requirements for large multinationals (those with global revenues exceeding €750 million). The filings require public disclosure of revenues, profits, employees, and taxes paid across jurisdictions, offering unprecedented visibility into how companies allocate their tax base.

    Beyond the headline numbers, the disclosures highlight the concentration of Apple’s European activity in Ireland. The company reported roughly $213.5–213.6 billion in revenues assigned to its Irish operations and pre-tax profits of about $34.6 billion there. It employs 5,575 people in Ireland (home to its European headquarters) translating to pre-tax profits on the order of $6 million per employee. By comparison, figures for other markets, such as Germany (around 4,089 employees), show far lower profit-per-employee metrics and much smaller tax payments relative to the overall total.

    Across 22 specified countries (including 18 EU member states plus others such as Norway, Vietnam, Russia, and Turkey), Apple paid about $17.6 billion in taxes. The remaining $25.6 billion went to all other jurisdictions, which include the United States. Apple’s U.S. federal income tax charge for the same period was reported at $11.5 billion. Over the past five years, the company has paid EU member states a cumulative $34 billion in taxes.

    Apple has emphasized that it is consistently one of the world’s largest taxpayers and that these corporate income tax figures focus on where assets and profits are booked, rather than consumption taxes such as VAT that are collected where customers are located.

    Ireland’s 12.5% corporate tax rate has long made it a preferred European base for U.S. technology and pharmaceutical giants. The strategy has delivered outsized results: in 2024, just three companies (widely identified as Apple, Microsoft, and Eli Lilly) accounted for nearly half of Ireland’s total corporate tax receipts, according to analysis by the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council. This concentration brings both bounty and risk; a shift by even one major payer could significantly affect public finances.

    The timing coincides with broader international efforts to curb profit shifting, including the OECD’s Pillar Two global minimum tax of 15%. Ireland has adapted its rules accordingly, and some of Apple’s recent payments already reflect elements of this framework. Yet the Apple case underscores persistent tensions: while the EU has used state-aid rules aggressively to challenge preferential arrangements, low-tax jurisdictions continue to attract investment, and companies continue to structure operations around intellectual property and holding entities.

    For Ireland, the $17.1 billion infusion is a one-time boost rather than a new normal. Stripping out the back taxes leaves a more conventional annual payment closer to the accrued figure of around $4.8 billion (an effective rate near 13.8% on the year’s Irish-booked profits). Still, the episode reinforces the country’s central role in the European operations of major American firms.

    The disclosures also fuel ongoing debates about fairness in the global tax system. Critics of low-tax regimes argue they erode the tax bases of larger economies; defenders point to the real economic activity, employment, and innovation hubs that such policies help create. Apple’s filings make one point unambiguous: when a decade-old legal dispute finally settles, the cash impact can be enormous, and highly concentrated in a single small EU member state.

    As more multinationals release similar country-by-country data under the new EU rules, expect sharper scrutiny of where profits are booked versus where value is created and where workforces are located. For now, Apple’s 2025 numbers stand as a vivid snapshot of the intersection of corporate strategy, national tax policy, and European competition enforcement.

    Apple doesn’t pay taxes, Apple’s customers do.

    Corporations do not pay taxes, we do. For every dollar or tens of dollars taxed and regulated onto companies, whether it be Apple, Coke or Bob’s Deli, we pay those costs. In reality, companies pay zero taxes, as they simply pass those costs down the line to the consumers of their products. Thus, we pay every dime of every regulation and tax bestowed onto corporations, every – single – dime.Mark Reschke, “Taxing Apple Just Taxes You,” T-GAAP, May 24, 2013


    .

    Source link: https://macdailynews.com/2026/08/24/apple-paid-40-of-global-taxes-to-ireland-last-year/

  • |

    How to use custom equalizer settings for your AirPods

    Learn how to adjust your AirPods’ equalizer when listening to music and watching videos on iPhone, iPad, or Mac for a personalized, fine-tuned audio experience.

    AirPods equalizer

    Apple sells a lot of AirPods and engineers them to sound great for most users right out of the box. After all, people appreciate a great experience without tweaking anything.

    But if you don’t like how your AirPods sound when listening to (specific) music, or watching movies and TV shows, you now have a simple equalizer to adjust the lows, mids, and highs.

    Unlike app-specific equalizers, like those found in Apple Music or Spotify settings, the EQ adjustments you make for your AirPods apply to everything you listen to via your AirPods, irrespective of which app you’re using. In contrast, app EQ settings work only for that app and with all wired and wireless earphones.

    Your custom AirPods EQ tuning syncs via iCloud to all your devices. As a result, you can set it on your iPhone and automatically enjoy the same experience on your iPad and Mac (I couldn’t find an AirPods Equalizer option anywhere on my Apple TV running tvOS 27).

    Supported AirPods

    You can use custom EQ on AirPods with the Apple H2 chip running the latest beta firmware version. The full device list is as follows:

    • AirPods Pro 2
    • AirPods Pro 3
    • AirPods 4
    • AirPods 4 with ANC
    • AirPods Max 2

    If I remember correctly, I got the equalizer feature on my AirPods Pro 3 in beta firmware version 9A336b, but currently I’m on 9A347a.

    AirPods beta updates on iPhone to get equalizer feature

    Update your AirPods to the latest version of beta firmware by going to AirPods Settings > AirPods Beta Update and turning on AirPods Beta Updates. Then put both AirPods in their case, plug the case to charge, and leave it near your iPhone, iPad, or Mac for about half an hour or overnight for the new firmware to auto-install (there is no way to force-install AirPods updates manually).

    Adjust equalizer for AirPods

    1) Connect your AirPods to your iPhone, iPad, or Mac and wear them. We’re using an iPhone running iOS 27 for these steps.

    2) Play a song or video in Apple Music, Spotify, YouTube, Chrome, Safari, or another app of choice.

    3) Open the Settings app and select your AirPods.

    4) Tap Audio & Routing.

    Audio and Routing in AirPods settings on iPhone

    5) Select Equalizer.

    6) Tap Custom instead of Recommended.

    7) Now, drag the high point dots for Low, Mid, or High frequency bands up or down to increase or decrease the bass, mids, and treble, respectively. You’ll hear the difference as you adjust the range. Experiment to see which sounds best for you. Tap Reset to start over.

    Adjusting Equalizer for AirPods on iPhone

    Here’s how it looks in macOS 27 Golden Gate System Settings:

    Adjusting Equalizer for AirPods on Mac

    If you ever need to revert to Apple-recommended EQ levels, repeat the steps above and select Recommended, or tap Reset to set all three bands to the middle.

    More on AirPods:

    Source link: https://www.idownloadblog.com/2026/08/24/airpods-equalizer/